Difference between revisions of "NGS"

(Challenges)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
==Challenges==
 
==Challenges==
 
* Short read NGS requires a priori knowledge of likelihood of particular haplotypes. ''In silico'' haplotype estimation can e.g. be performed by [http://faculty.washington.edu/browning/beagle/beagle.html Beagle].
 
* Short read NGS requires a priori knowledge of likelihood of particular haplotypes. ''In silico'' haplotype estimation can e.g. be performed by [http://faculty.washington.edu/browning/beagle/beagle.html Beagle].
* Variants in homologous regions are hard to capture.
+
* Variants in homologous regions are hard to capture. Notably, the genes CYP2D6 and CYP2A6 are challenging.
 
* HLA-typing require special software, e.g. [https://software.broadinstitute.org/cancer/cga/polysolver Polysolver] for whole exome sequencing or [https://github.com/FRED-2/OptiType OptiType] for whole genome sequencing
 
* HLA-typing require special software, e.g. [https://software.broadinstitute.org/cancer/cga/polysolver Polysolver] for whole exome sequencing or [https://github.com/FRED-2/OptiType OptiType] for whole genome sequencing

Revision as of 08:33, 14 August 2018

Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) is an interesting technology for PGx

A nice overview of the Requirements for comprehensive pharmacogenetic genotyping platforms was published by Volker Lauschke et al. They claim that rare variants account for 30-40% of functional variability in PGx. However they argue that pre-emptive PGx should only include validated variants, and rare variants should be investigated only when the patient experience unexpected drug response.

Challenges

  • Short read NGS requires a priori knowledge of likelihood of particular haplotypes. In silico haplotype estimation can e.g. be performed by Beagle.
  • Variants in homologous regions are hard to capture. Notably, the genes CYP2D6 and CYP2A6 are challenging.
  • HLA-typing require special software, e.g. Polysolver for whole exome sequencing or OptiType for whole genome sequencing